The Institute

European in purpose. Exact about evidence.

Civic Method Institute develops methods and research for policy design, evaluation and institutional learning.

Improve the evidence and reasoning available to democratic institutions.

Public decisions must often be made before uncertainty disappears. The relevant standard is disciplined reasoning, proportionate testing and the ability to respond when outcomes differ from expectations.

CMI connects policy design, implementation and evaluation so that assumptions can be challenged before a decision and learning can change what happens afterwards.

Public health, nutrition and food systems.

The initial programme concentrates on a domain where public objectives, scientific evidence, commercial conduct, lived environments and implementation capacity interact directly.

This focus includes evidence synthesis, food-policy appraisal, monitoring and evaluation, corporate food-sector assessment, stakeholder research and the communication of scientific findings.

Explore the four practices

Knowledge that remains useful after a decision.

Research

Public contribution

Methods and research status are published so that claims can be understood, challenged and reused.

Practice

Decision relevance

Outputs are shaped around the legal, administrative and political conditions in which a decision occurs.

Learning

Institutional memory

Decision records connect objectives, evidence, assumptions, outcomes and later adaptations.

Authority should be visible where it exists.

Research items identify their authorship, status, version, funding position, conflicts, review and limitations. No project relationship or observed result is implied without a corresponding public record.

Begin with the policy question.

Public institutions, research organisations and public-interest foundations can approach CMI with a consequential policy question, its decision context and the evidence already available.